Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Tutorial 10 — Recovery rheology

Corporate Research Analytical Laboratory, 3M

Recovery rheology splits the total shear strain of a viscoelastic material into a recoverable (elastic) part and an unrecoverable (viscous or plastic) part (Lee et al., 2019),

γtot=γrec+γunrec.\gamma_\mathrm{tot} = \gamma_\mathrm{rec} + \gamma_\mathrm{unrec}.

The recoverable strain is measured directly: the imposed deformation is interrupted, the stress is set to zero, and the strain that returns is recorded. Each component then defines its own material function, the recoverable modulus Grec=σ/γrecG_\mathrm{rec} = \sigma/\gamma_\mathrm{rec} and the flow viscosity ηflow=σ/γ˙unrec\eta_\mathrm{flow} = \sigma/\dot\gamma_\mathrm{unrec} (Singh et al., 2021). This separates solid-like from fluid-like contributions that conventional moduli mix, for example across a yield transition (Donley et al., 2020).

RecoveryRheology analyses Anton Paar RheoCompass exports with two protocols:

  • method="oscillatory" (oscillatory recovery): oscillations interrupted by zero-stress recovery steps. Forward and reverse runs with opposite strain amplitude are averaged as (A−B)/2(A - B)/2, which keeps the response that is odd in strain and cancels drift that does not change sign.

  • method="step" (step-function recovery): strain- or stress-controlled deformation steps of increasing duration, each followed by a zero-stress recovery step.

All recovery data in this tutorial are full resolution.

Oscillatory recovery

The Fourier component of the averaged stress at the test frequency ω\omega gives the conventional G′G' and G′′G''. The transform then reconstructs a full period of the strain, recoverable strain and stress, and computes cycle-averaged energies for each strain component x∈{tot,rec,unrec}x \in \{\mathrm{tot}, \mathrm{rec}, \mathrm{unrec}\}:

Gx′=2 ⟨γx σ⟩γ02,Gx′′=2 ⟨γ˙x σ⟩(ω γ0)2,G'_x = \frac{2\,\langle \gamma_x\,\sigma \rangle}{\gamma_0^2}, \qquad G''_x = \frac{2\,\langle \dot\gamma_x\,\sigma \rangle}{(\omega\,\gamma_0)^2},

where γ0\gamma_0 is the total-strain amplitude. Gsolid′=Grec′G'_\mathrm{solid} = G'_\mathrm{rec} is the energy stored elastically, Gsolid′′=Grec′′G''_\mathrm{solid} = G''_\mathrm{rec} the energy dissipated by recoverable deformation, and Gfluid′′=Gunrec′′G''_\mathrm{fluid} = G''_\mathrm{unrec} the energy dissipated by flow. Supply the known omega (rad/s); otherwise it is estimated from the data.

Lissajous figures plot the stress against total strain, recoverable strain and unrecoverable strain rate. A stress–γrec\gamma_\mathrm{rec} loop that collapses to a straight line indicates purely elastic recovery, while the stress–γ˙unrec\dot\gamma_\mathrm{unrec} loop shows the fluid contribution.

<Figure size 400x400 with 1 Axes>
<Figure size 400x400 with 1 Axes>
<Figure size 400x400 with 1 Axes>

Amplitude series

batch_oscillatory_recovery applies the analysis to every file in a folder; here, one polymer melt at the same temperature and ω=0.316\omega = 0.316 rad/s for strain amplitudes from 1 % to 631 %. In the linear regime the decomposed moduli are constant and Gsolid′G'_\mathrm{solid} dominates. At large amplitudes, Gsolid′G'_\mathrm{solid} decreases while Gfluid′′G''_\mathrm{fluid} grows, showing the transition from recoverable deformation to flow. Pass export_dir= to also write the per-file Excel results and Lissajous figures.

<Figure size 600x400 with 1 Axes>

Step-function recovery

Each deformation step is followed by recovery at zero stress. The strain left after recovery is γunrec\gamma_\mathrm{unrec}, and the recovered strain is

γrec(tr)=γtot(texp)−γ(tr),\gamma_\mathrm{rec}(t_\mathrm{r}) = \gamma_\mathrm{tot}(t_\mathrm{exp}) - \gamma(t_\mathrm{r}),

where texpt_\mathrm{exp} is the end of the deformation and trt_\mathrm{r} the recovery time. Increasing the step duration maps how the recoverable and unrecoverable strains build up during the deformation. plot_step_results shows the three strains against experimental time; plot_transient shows the recovered strain against recovery time for each step. The same analysis applies to any deformation step; the three examples below use step strain, creep and start-up shear.

Step strain

A strain of 2000 % (γtot=20\gamma_\mathrm{tot} = 20) is held for increasing durations at 100 °C. The total strain is fixed, so the analysis shows how it is partitioned: as the stress relaxes during longer holds, more of the imposed strain becomes unrecoverable and less is recovered.

<Figure size 600x400 with 1 Axes>
<Figure size 600x400 with 1 Axes>

Creep

A constant stress of 100 Pa is applied for increasing durations at 70 °C. The total strain grows with the creep time; at this stress most of it is recovered, and the unrecoverable strain, the flow contribution, builds up slowly.

<Figure size 600x400 with 1 Axes>
<Figure size 600x400 with 1 Axes>

Start-up shear

A constant shear rate of 1 s−1^{-1} is applied for increasing durations at 70 °C, so the total strain grows linearly with time. The recoverable strain saturates as the material approaches steady flow, after which the additional strain is unrecoverable.

<Figure size 600x400 with 1 Axes>
<Figure size 600x400 with 1 Axes>

Both result objects export the transient data and moduli with to_excel(path).

References

  • Lee, J. C.-W., Weigandt, K. M., Kelley, E. G. and Rogers, S. A., Structure–Property Relationships via Recovery Rheology in Viscoelastic Materials, Physical Review Letters 122, 248003 (2019). DOI: Lee et al. (2019).

  • Donley, G. J., Singh, P. K., Shetty, A. and Rogers, S. A., Elucidating the G″ overshoot in soft materials with a yield transition via a time-resolved experimental strain decomposition, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 21945–21952 (2020). DOI: Donley et al. (2020).

  • Singh, P. K., Lee, J. C.-W., Patankar, K. A. and Rogers, S. A., Revisiting the basis of transient rheological material functions: Insights from recoverable strain measurements, Journal of Rheology 65, 129–144 (2021). DOI: 10.1122/8.0000154.

  • Shi, J. and Rogers, S. A., The benefits of a formalism built on recovery: Theory, experiments, and modeling, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics 321, 105113 (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2023.105113.

References
  1. Lee, J. C.-W., Weigandt, K. M., Kelley, E. G., & Rogers, S. A. (2019). Structure-Property Relationships via Recovery Rheology in Viscoelastic Materials. Physical Review Letters, 122(24). 10.1103/physrevlett.122.248003
  2. Donley, G. J., Singh, P. K., Shetty, A., & Rogers, S. A. (2020). Elucidating the G″ overshoot in soft materials with a yield transition via a time-resolved experimental strain decomposition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(36), 21945–21952. 10.1073/pnas.2003869117